Another idea they mention is that how now anyone can become a writer due to things such as Twitter, Wikipedia, or blogs just like this one. Comments can be left, interactions can occur, and a group of followers can be established just by publishing one interesting article or idea. This type of writing does not require much ability or a publisher or anything of that sort, which literally mobilizes anyone to be able to post online and even get recognized on a local, national or global level.
I think that this is a great way for new writers to get recognized, but however I think it can be dangerous in some areas because it could be hard to determine whether or not the source is credible. Online can sometimes be a sticky place due to the fact that things can be cut and pasted or misrepresented. This really causes me to be skeptical of information that I find online and websites which I find them on. Since this line is blurring so much between audience and author, I personally have begun intently researching authors and their credentials so that I am not mislead. And I would suggest everyone do that as well, so that authors (such as me) are not just strictly taken for what they post online without additional needed background.
This picture is what I think of when thinking of the normal representation of a reader/speaker presenting their information to an audience. It is an active listening audience.
http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/37/3791/BDCIF00Z/posters/beatnik-poet-reading-to-an-audience.jpg
This next image I believe is a representation of how there is not just one central author or speaker but rather they are all intertwined and interconnected.

No comments:
Post a Comment